Book: The Man in the High Castle, by Philip K. Dick


Grade: A-

Why: The first fully successful alternative history. Japan and Germany triumph in World War II, but a novelist living in Japan-controlled Cheyenne has written a bestselling alternative history in which Germany lost. Fearing German reprisals, the writer has retreated to a guarded fortress: he has become the Man in the High Castle.

I’ve been meaning to read this for years, and I was so exasperated by James Wood’s snotty pretentiousness that I decided to read science fiction for my second title. Philip K. Dick can be difficult to read. He doesn’t give you a lot of backstory; you plunge right into the story and have to figure out what’s going along as you read. But if you persist, the kaleidescope of fragmented scenes eventually starts to shake itself into a visible image. It’s a composition skill that I admire. When I write, I always overexplain; you have to have a lot of confidence in yourself and in your readers to write as he does.

In one way, The Man in the High Castle is intriguing because it so clearly lent its techniques and strategies to an entire genre. Alternative history existed before this novel, but almost every alternative history that follows it owes Philip K. Dick a debt. By coincidence I just finished watching the prematurely-cancelled TV series Jericho, and was struck by the number of ways in which the episodes pay homage to this book.

As a stand-alone work, the book fascinates by circling around and around the idea of reality. There are three political realities in the book: the one in the reader’s mind (ours), the one in which the characters live (a world divided between Japanese and German control), and the one constructed by the Man in the High Castle’s novel-within-a-novel; the Allies triumph in his book, but there are significant differences between that triumph and the one that we know. A secondary plot involves the sale of “genuine historical artifacts,” American items from before the war, and by the end of the book we are forced to question seriously what “genuine” means. And almost every character has a double identity: which one is “real”?

Philip K. Dick even manages to question his own skills, channeling James Wood at the same time that he laughs at high-brow pretensions. “Amazing, the power of fiction, even cheap popular fiction to evoke,” one of the German victors thinks to himself after reading the Man in the High Castle’s novel. “They know a million tricks, these novelists….Yes, the novelist knows humanity, how worthless they are…swayed by cowardice, selling out every cause because of their greed–all he’s got to do is thump on the drum, and there’s his response. And he laughing, of course, behind his hand at the effect he gets.”

The minus is because Philip K Dick is not much on character development; he’s a plot and theme man, and there’s not a lot of psychological reality to his people. Which is fine. Take the novel on its own terms.

Showing 4 comments
  • Jenny Wells

    Really enjoying your perspectives on these books. How Fiction Works was in my TBR pile and this sounds like a book for my husband who’s always looking to me to pick them out for him. Thanks!

  • Ron

    And she has good taste in SF, too!

    If you enjoy PKD, you should check out Tim Powers. He and James Blaylock hung out with PKD, and they have some things in common (though Powers is much better on character development). Powers specializes in his own style of quirky semi-alternate histories. “The Anubis Gates” has romantic poets in Victorian London (along with werewolves and Egyptian gods). “The Stress of Her Regard” stars the Byron and Shelley you never knew about — with vampires. “Declare” is WW2 spies and djinns and other wonders. “Last Call” is Vegas and Bugsy Siegel and Tarot cards and the Fisher King. And of course “The Drawing of the Dark” is Merlin and Arthur and beer and Vikings and the Turkish siege of Vienna. All great fun.

  • Pam aka newlifemom

    Just wanted to let you know I read it and really enjoyed it. There seemed (in my small mind with little understanding of thing literature) to be an underlying discussion of political philosophy. In the end when Abendson says that they didn’t win left me wondering what was meant and I have leapt to many conclusions since then. any book that makes me keep reworking itself in my head is a good one I say. Thanks for the pick.

  • Keaton

    I really enjoyed your phrasing when you said “if you persist, the kaleidescope of fragmented scenes eventually starts to shake itself into a visible image.” In my opinion, this comment really hits the nail on the head. However, I have to disagree with your reason for giving the minus: of all the PKD I’ve read, The Man in the High Castle is one of the best at developing characterization.

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt