Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Facebook Posts

I love maps, which is why the September 4 UN resolution recommending (not mandating) use of the Equal Earth projection fascinates me.

Excuse me while I quote from The Well-Trained Mind:

"History and geography fall naturally together; every time you study an event or person, you'll want to look up the location on the globe, the wall map, and in the atlas (which will give you not only political borders but also a brief history of the region). NOTE: Don't neglect the use of a globe--all wall maps and atlases distort land masses by laying them out flat."

The Mercator projection that we all grew up with (and which was originally meant for seafaring navigators) does indeed distort northern land masses ENORMOUSLY. The attached graphic shows the difference between the Equal Earth projection (red, much closer to a global representation) and the traditional Mercator projection, which makes Greenland, Alaska, Canada, and Russia in particular seem much larger than they actually are.

We should all try to have an accurate understanding of the world, which is why I find it so mind-boggling that the United States was the single "nay" vote at the UN (there were 164 "ayes") endorsing the resolution. Apparently, as a country, we believe that a more realistic map is a "radical ideological project."

Well, some of us would just like a more realistic map.

Have a look at the United Nations report, and also at this excellent take on maps other than Equal Earth that try to correct the Mercator distortions.

futuremaps.com/blogs/news/top-10-world-map-projections

news.un.org/en/story/2026/09/1168284
... See MoreSee Less

1 day ago

I love maps, which is why the September 4 UN resolution recommending (not mandating) use of the Equal Earth projection fascinates me.

Excuse me while I quote from The Well-Trained Mind:

History and geography fall naturally together; every time you study an event or person, youll want to look up the location on the globe, the wall map, and in the atlas (which will give you not only political borders but also a brief history of the region). NOTE: Dont neglect the use of a globe--all wall maps and atlases distort land masses by laying them out flat.

The Mercator projection that we all grew up with (and which was originally meant for seafaring navigators) does indeed distort northern land masses ENORMOUSLY. The attached graphic shows the difference between the Equal Earth projection (red, much closer to a global representation) and the traditional Mercator projection, which makes Greenland, Alaska, Canada, and Russia in particular seem much larger than they actually are.

We should all try to have an accurate understanding of the world, which is why I find it so mind-boggling that the United States was the single nay vote at the UN (there were 164 ayes) endorsing the resolution. Apparently, as a country, we believe that a more realistic map is a radical ideological project.

Well, some of us would just like a more realistic map.

Have a look at the United Nations report, and also at this excellent take on maps other than Equal Earth that try to correct the Mercator distortions.

https://futuremaps.com/blogs/news/top-10-world-map-projections

https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/09/1168284

Comment on Facebook

"that we all grew up with" might be a misnomer. I grew up with dozens of different maps, not just the Mercador. Are there really people that have made it to their adults lives not knowing that these other maps (including the "equal earth") have existed for 300+ years?

you obviosuly missed that FACT that there were other countries who didn't want ot change as well. They just didn't make a vocal objection but instead just abstained from voting

Next on UN agenda is Toilet Paper Roll Over or Under

Two points to this. One- In the new “better” image, yall make it seem as if some fictitious ocean exists between Canada and the US… where no separation actually exists. Two- there are actual cities and countries and names of places that everyone in the world recognizes across Europe and the United States. No one gives a damn about the names of the capital of the Congo 🤷‍♂️ The map is made to help those who intend to actually use the map- ie those who travel and go places. Zimbabweans tend to stay put 🤷‍♂️

This one has been my personal favorite for many years. No flat map of the earth will ever be completely accurate, but it works pretty well for what I want out of it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boggs_eumorphic_projection

Whoever was responsible for dictating how the US voted did NOT take Mrs. Smithfield's Earth science class wherein we discussed at great length how one can never accurately render a 3D object onto a 2D surface. <ahem> LOL (That said, there is a very sophisticated 2D projection that comes really close to getting the landmass sizes correct, but it's also all "chopped" to bits and could never really be used for things like navigation.)

This kerfuffle is weird to me because I've not ever seen Mercator as standard. Lots of books and wall posters have different projections. Whatever is on my wall is neither of these.

When I was kid my mom had a map with the orange slice cutouts at the top and bottom. This made for a lovely discussion about trying put something round on a flat surface.

Ukraine voted no because UN decided to separate Crimea from Ukraine on the map, even though other countries occupied by russia like Moldova and Georgia are shown as whole. This is what you get when you have terrorist regimes with voting power in UN.

I first learned about this from a West Wing episode, but what surprises me now is how long more accurate (or at least equally valid alternatives) have been around without making much of a dent. Many of the ones listed in the first link have origins in the 1800s.

Wait….wutt???? Are you saying the light red representations are the accurate sizes?

I would support this. It should be clearly taught when used as a tool that equal earth maps would be better for depiction of land mass, population, epidemiology etc. Once the discussion is about navigation though, we'll br back to Mercator.

A realistic map is called a “globe”

Fascinating. I'd rather see true representations.

This is super cool. My one observation? When driving north to Alaska, Canada does feel as big as the old maps showed... :). More to explore!!

For accurate land area it's hard to beat Goode's projection

For navigation, use the Mercator map. For accurate sizes, use a globe. Plain and simple.

I find this interesting. I am 83 and grew up in what was then French West Africa. In my mind, the USA was much bigger than French West Africa. Playing with the different maps is always educational. The concept of size controls how we think of things. We always want the biggest cookie.

The reason for the "no" vote us that it has the word "equal" in it and we here in the US have never actually liked that

The UN resolution described correcting map distortions as an issue of “cognitive justice and memorial reparation.” Their words. I thought the US representative was pretty clear that the US didn’t object to the map itself. The objection was to the ideological baggage attached to it. Why can’t the UN just say, “This map represents land area more accurately. Let’s use it”? Mercator had a purpose, and it has flaws. New maps have different strengths. Fine. But apparently we have to turn a mathematical limitation into a historical grievance and attach “reparation” language to it. Who comes up with this stuff? It seems so unnecessarily childish. Anyway, we can use the better maps without the UN telling us to. 🙂 i do love the map you posted!

My kids love Seterra games where they look for countries. There are different games one can play but my son has gotten so good he does the one where there are no borders, just a blank land map of the world and you have to click on the spot when prompted a name of a country. I wonder if Seterra makes changes and how will that effect the games.

Mercator is for ocean navigation, not land travel.

One of my favorites is the National Geographic “the world at night”. One of the most politically interesting is the black space between China and South Korea. Absolutely no light except a tiny spot at the capital

Define "more realistic". You can either have the sizes right or the shapes right, not both. The hurt feelings around Africa being shown as smaller than it actually is might have been helped if they had considered that AFrica is in the center of both maps. This was Africa's "Gulf of America"

The only thing I don’t like about this map is that people who don’t know better might think the equator runs through the center of it, instead of through Ecuador, both Congos, and Indonesia. And the fact that it doesn’t include Antarctica.

View more comments

Load more
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Not readable? Change text. captcha txt