Looks like Bruce Nelson won the poll below in a landslide. Thanks.
Now for news from the annoying-details-of-production front. I have FINISHED, yes, finished, drawing all the maps, and have turned them over to the talented Sarah Park so that she can turn them into works of art (see my January 26th post below). Nancy is working on the permissions letters for all the text quotes (see February 21). So I have turned to the issue of the illustrations.
I had planned on including 36 illustrations–none of them huge glossy color pictures, since the text, not the photos, carries this history along–but each of them illuminating a certain point. For example, when I describe the wedge-shaped cuneiform of the Sumerians, wouldn’t it be nice to SEE a Sumerian tablet with wedge-shaped writing?
I have my own photos taken at the British Museum–here’s a Sumerian tablet:
However, I can’t use my own photos. For one thing, they were taken through glass, so they’re a little fuzzy–fine for my own reference, but not great for reproduction. But the biggest issue is copyright. The British Museum owns the rights to images of any objects in their collection, so I can’t just reprint my own snapshots.
Out of my 36 illustrations, 32 are photos of historical objects (the bust of Nero, the mummy of Rameses II, an Assyrian picture of Jehu of Israel bringing tribute to the Assyrian king Shalmaneser). All of these objects are in different museums. The simplest way to get high-quality illustrations is to go through a commercial clearing house which takes high-quality photos and manages the rights. Here is a cuneiform tablet, courtesy of Corbis Images, one of the biggest and most widely-used clearing houses:
Yes, it’s a small image, because you have to buy the rights to reproduce the full-sized one. So I sent Corbis all the information about my own book (what territories it will be published in, copies in the first print run, cover price, whether the illustration will be less or more than a half page, etc.) and got a quote back.
Sheesh. Multiply that times 32. Gasp. Clutch.
But I really WANT the photos. OK, the Sumerian tablet may not be THAT exciting (although I always marvel that anyone can actually READ that stuff), but consider this: In my chapter on the Philistines I say that they were cultural magpies, taking bits of other peoples’ culture rather than creating their own. (So were the Romans, but they always come off better, somehow.) One example: The Philistines were part of an invasion of Egypt and, while down in the Delta, saw Egyptian writing and Egyptian sarcophagi. So they began to create their own Egyptian-style coffins. But because they were stealing someone else’s customs, the coffins are odd-looking. The features are out of proportion, and although there are Egyptian-style hieroglyphs painted on them, the hieroglyphs are meaningless gibberish–copies made by an artist who didn’t understand the original.
Here’s a coffin (my own British Museum photo):
Now isn’t it nice to SEE that?
However, I can’t afford $525.00 per picture, so I’ve put in a call to Corbis to find out whether I can get a reduced rate (apparently they’ve got some sort of corporate arrangement with Norton). I’m contacting the museums directly to find out if there’s a cheaper way to do this. I’m searching around through other picture services. And hey, if anybody’s got a photo of the Midas Monument or a Shang bronze that you’d like to send along, let me know.
My next post will be from Chicago, where I’ll be speaking this weekend. If any of my readers are there, come up and say hi and I’ll put a picture on the blog.
ADDENDUM, two hours after original post…
Just in case any of you have friends-with-photos (like JFS below), here’s a list of the illustrations I’m looking for:
Scorpion King Macehead
Mohenjo-Daro Man (statue)
Statue of Senusret III
Sculpture of Cretan Bull-dancer
Battle of Kadesh frieze
Mummy of Rameses II
Jehu on the Black Obelisk
First World Map (Babylonia)
Terracotta army of the First Emperor
And the following busts: Philip of Macedonia, Alexander the Great, Sulla, Pompey, Caesar, Octavian, Nero, Commodus, Constantine.
There, I have cast my bread upon the waters, and we’ll see whether any floats back (or whether it sinks, soggy, to the bottom).
In Chicago? THIS weekend? When, where? Would the Oriental Institute at University of Chicago have any images you could use?
I will ask my local amiga if her dad (one of the world’s few scholars in these old writings) if he would have any images to share.
I’ll be in Naperville at a classical school–see http://www.welltrainedmind.com/speaking.php for more.
And I’ve added a list of the illustrations I’m looking for to the post above–so if your local amiga or anyone else knows of a photo floating around, let me know!
This gives me a new appreciation of photos! I tend to fall in the “visual learner” category myself… so YES I love seeing pics. Thank you for opening up the world of history to not only my daughters but me as well. What an enrichment to our lives! Thank you thank you thank you.
Isn’t that a photo of you in your brother’s photo gallery?
Is there any reason you wouldn’t want to use that picture for your book jacket?
It could easily be converted to black and white, and after a little retouching (stray hairs removed, etc.), it would be perfect!
I retouch and restore photos, so feel free to email me if I can help in any way with that.
I always like to see a lot of pictures, because it really helps me get it set in my head. But anyway, my contribution is to ask whether you could put in line drawings sometimes instead of photos. I’ve been reading a favorite book of mine, called “Women’s work: the first 20,000 years” which is all about textiles and weaving and such, and it’s full of little drawings of cuneiform and yarn and looms and whatnot–sometimes they’re easier to figure out than the photos would be, and sometimes not so much. But wouldn’t those be copyright-free, if you drew them? Or not? (And go read the book, everybody, ’cause it’s really good. If you like fabric, anyway.)
OK, amiga called her dad, who left University of Chicago 5 years back…he actually specialized in Hittite (sp?) stuff, and reports that all his photos were on study loan to him from UC anyway, so not available for publication w/o the usual fee from UC (Oriental Instititute has rights to most of the good stuff). I did check the O.I. website and they seem to charge almost as much as British Museum. Amiga’s Padre reports that the fee is just about the same everywhere, and it is a good money maker for museums so they are unlikely to cut a hard-working homeschool mom any slack. He suggested line drawings where possible, and even internet links to stuff, too. Why not shorten your list (remove some of the more common images like the Sphinx, Terra Cotta Army, Ramses II mummy), go for line drawings of a few where feasible (perhaps the cuniform and Isthar Gate?) to save your pocketbook a tad. Keep the best, most colorful and esoteric images, and add a heap of internet links to websites with more images.
Sorry to make your bread soggy 🙁
What a nice suggestion!
The photo Bob took of Susan is just beautiful.
Even if it is not used….I’m glad you pointed it out, it is such a pretty picture!
What do you think, Susan?
That settles it! I am in the wrong business.
Dy, off to find out about procuring copyright management status for something interesting that someone will pay me to include in their books!
Interesting topic that I know nothing about. I bought an aging set of Hillyer’s 1966 “Young People’s Story of Our Heritage” and have enjoyed the rich illustrations in that set. Is there any advantage of trying to use some of the illustrations from any of those books, or would you be in the same situation with them as the others?